Oostlandse glastuinbouw zet koers naar 2030 : Verduurzamingsrichtingen energievoorziening van de Oostlandse glastuinbouw
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For greenhouse horticulture in the region of Oostland far-reaching changes are foreseen in three scenarios for 2030 when looking at energy use. The scenarios consist of pessimistic, moderate and optimistic development routes of greenhouse horticulture in the Oostland region. The changes have the most impact on energy supply sources, which will rely less on natural gas and more on sustainable sources and purchase of energy from third parties, and are a result of changes in energy demand and mutations of sector structure, sustainability efforts of the greenhouse enterprises with their partners and government policy. The changes have a positive effect on the reduction of CO2 emissions and the share of renewable energy. It has emerged that energy sustainability is related to the modernisation of greenhouses, that cooperation between companies, their partners and governments is essential and that expansion of energy-networks are of great importance. The glasshouse horticulture in Oostland distinguishes itself with its own characteristics in terms of sector structure, energy demand and energy supply from national greenhouse horticulture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".