MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2963829754 · doi:10.1097/ico.0000000000002073

Combined Phototherapeutic Keratectomy, Intracorneal Ring Segment Implantation, and Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking in Keratoconus Management

2019· article· en· W2963829754 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCornea · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCorneal surgery and disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaBrandon Regional Health Authority
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKeratoconusPhototherapeutic keratectomyOphthalmologyMedicineCorneal collagen cross-linkingCorneal DiseasesPhotorefractive keratectomyCornea

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy, predictability, and safety of combined corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL), intracorneal ring segment (ICRS) implantation, and superficial phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) in patients with keratoconus. METHODS: Fifty-five eyes received ICRS implantation, followed by CXL and PTK combination treatment. Patients were followed up for 6 months. Primary outcomes included Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (LogMAR) uncorrected distance VA (UDVA) and corrected distance VA (CDVA), sphere, cylinder, mean spherical equivalent, index of surface variance, index of vertical asymmetry, keratoconus index, central keratoconus index, index of height asymmetry, and index of height decentration. Secondary outcomes were higher-order aberrations (HOAs), including HOA total, coma, spherical, secondary astigmatism, and trefoil. RESULTS: At 6 months, there was a statistically significant improvement in UDVA, CDVA, sphere, and cylinder compared with baseline (P < 0.001). UDVA improved in 14% of the eyes to 20/25 and 96% had at least 20/40 or better spectacle corrected vision; 30.9% of the eyes were within ±0.5 diopter (D), 45.5% of the eyes were within ±1.0 D, and 74.5% of the eyes were within ±2.0 D. For CDVA, 1 eye (2%) lost 3 lines (but gained UDVA), 11% lost 1 line, 38% showed no change, and 49% gained between 1 and 8 lines of vision. Eighty-eight United Arab Emiratespercent of the eyes had at least 1 line of UDVA visual improvement, 79% improved by ≥2 lines, and 69% improved by ≥3 lines. HOA total, coma, spherical aberration, and secondary astigmatism showed improvements of -0.87 (P < 0.001), -0.84 (P < 0.001), -0.10 (P = 0.002), and -0.15 (P = 0.035), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A combined procedure of ICRS implantation, CXL, and PTK is effective, predictable, and apparently safe for patients diagnosed with moderate keratoconus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it