MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2963883588 · doi:10.1097/ico.0000000000002085

Did Collagen Cross-Linking Reduce the Requirement for Corneal Transplantation in Keratoconus? The Canadian Experience

2019· article· en· W2963883588 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCornea · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCorneal surgery and disorders
Canadian institutionsBank of CanadaVancouver General HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKeratoconusMedicineCorneal transplantationOphthalmologyEye bankCorneal graftTransplantationSurgeryCornea

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) and the number of corneal transplants required for the treatment of keratoconus (KCN) in 2 major Canadian provinces. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of all corneal transplantation performed in Ontario and British Columbia over an 18-year period (1998-2016). Data were collected at the Eye Bank of Canada-Ontario/British Columbia Divisions. The primary outcome was to determine the change in proportion and absolute number of corneal transplants required for treatment of KCN since the introduction of CXL in Canada in 2008. RESULTS: A total of 31,943 grafts were included. Overall, the mean age of participants was 39.3 ± 2.2 years, with our cohort being composed of 28% of women and 72% of men. The results showed a significant decrease in the proportion of total transplants required for KCN between 1998 and 2016 [1998-2008 (pre-CXL), range: 14.77%-12.63%; 2009-2016 (post-CXL), range: 12.98%-5.50%, P < 0.001]. However, there was no change in the absolute number of grafts performed for KCN over this time (pre-CXL: 179 ± 26 grafts; post-CXL: 198 ± 27 grafts; P = 0.5), whereas the total number of grafts (pre-CXL: 1318 ± 183 grafts; post-CXL: 2181 ± 404; P < 0.001) and endothelial keratoplasties (pre-CXL: 59 ± 108; post-CXL: 966 ± 431 grafts; P < 0.001) increased significantly. In addition, there were no changes in penetrating keratoplasty/deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) performed for indications other than KCN (pre-CXL: 1080 ± 157; post-CXL: 1017 ± 92; P > 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Although there has been a significant decrease in the proportion of corneal graft rates for KCN since the introduction of CXL as a factor of all transplants performed for all indications, this result is most likely because of an increase in endothelial keratoplasties rather than decreased transplants performed for definitive treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it