Split‐ring‐resonator‐loaded multiband frequency agile slot‐based MIMO antenna system
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, a compact quad‐element multiple‐input‐multiple‐output (MIMO) antenna system is proposed. The design consists of four annular slot‐line based MIMO elements, printed on a commercially available RO4350 substrate with a total size of . Each annular slot has a rectangular slot inside it to increase its electrical length to further bring down the resonance frequency. Furthermore, a T‐shaped defected ground structure is utilised to increase the isolation between the closely spaced antenna elements. Each element is loaded with a unique split ring resonator (SRR), which results in size reduction as well as multi‐band operation covering 1.7–2.28, 2.35–2.85 and 2.9–3.1 GHz. Moreover, by using only a single varactor diode per element, fine frequency tuning over these bands is achieved. A wide frequency sweep over multi‐band and a peak gain of 2.95 dBi with 82% maximum radiation efficiency is achieved. Low envelope correlation coefficient values are observed throughout the operating band, thus offering good MIMO performance. The overall planar antenna design is compact, low‐profile and can easily be integrated with radio frequency front ends in second generation cognitive radios among many other applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".