MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2964051154 · doi:10.1017/s1474748019000318

THE DYNAMICAL MORDELL-LANG CONJECTURE for ENDOMORPHISMS of SEMIABELIAN VARIETIES DEFINED over FIELDS of POSITIVE CHARACTERISTIC

2019· article· en· W2964051154 on OpenAlexaff
Pietro Corvaja, Dragos Ghioca, Thomas Scanlon, Umberto Zannier

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitutional Research Information System (University of Udine) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsSubvarietyConjectureEndomorphismUnicodeCombinatoricsAlgebraically closed fieldDiscrete mathematicsAlgebraic groupAlgebraic numberVariety (cybernetics)Mathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let K be an algebraically closed field of prime characteristic p, let X be a semiabelian variety defined over a finite subfield of K, let Phi : X -> X be a regular self-map defined over K, let V subset of X be a subvariety defined over K, and let alpha is an element of X(K). The dynamical Mordell-Lang conjecture in characteristic p predicts that the set S = {n is an element of N: Phi(n)(alpha) is an element of V} is a union of finitely many arithmetic progressions, along with finitely many p-sets, which are sets of the form {Sigma(m)(i=1) c(i) p(ki ni) : n(i) is an element of N} for some m is an element of N, some rational numbers ci and some non-negative integers ki. We prove that this conjecture is equivalent with some difficult diophantine problem in characteristic 0. In the case X is an algebraic torus, we can prove the conjecture in two cases: either when dim(V) <= 2, or when no iterate of 8 is a group endomorphism which induces the action of a power of the Frobenius on a positive...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.597
Threshold uncertainty score0.273

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitutional Research Information System (University of Udine)Same topicAlgebraic Geometry and Number TheoryFrench-language works237,207