MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2964094552 · doi:10.22323/1.358.0770

Measurement of the Extragalactic Background Light with VERITAS

2019· article· en· W2964094552 on OpenAlexfundno aff
E. Pueschel

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of 36th International Cosmic Ray Conference — PoS(ICRC2019) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Energy Research Scientific Computing CenterU.S. Department of EnergyOffice of ScienceSmithsonian InstitutionNational Science Foundation
KeywordsExtragalactic background lightPhysicsBlazarRedshiftCosmic infrared backgroundAstrophysicsReionizationCherenkov radiationBackground radiationGalaxyAstronomyActive galactic nucleusRadiationSpectral lineInfraredZodiacal lightCosmic rayTelescopeGamma rayCosmic microwave backgroundOpticsDetector

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The extragalactic background light records the history of infrared, optical and ultraviolet light radiation including re-radiation since the epoch of reionization. While challenging to measure directly, it can be measured indirectly via its impact on observed spectra of extragalactic gamma-ray emitters. VERITAS, a ground-based imaging atmospheric-Cherenkov telescope array sensitive to gamma rays above 100 GeV, has accrued 10 years of observations of hard-spectrum blazars. The energy and redshift range covered enables the measurement of the EBL in the range 0.56-56 $\mu$m, accessing the poorly constrained cosmic infrared background region. New constraints on the EBL resulting from the joint analysis using 16 spectra from 14 VERITAS-observed blazars will be presented. The method is independent of assumptions about the shape of the EBL spectrum, and includes a full treatment of systematic and statistical uncertainties. The measured spectrum is in good agreement with lower limits from galaxy counts, limiting the potential contribution from a diffuse component.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of 36th International Cosmic Ray Conference — PoS(ICRC2019)Same topicAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207