Regulation of toxic shock syndrome toxin‐1 by the accessory gene regulator in <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> is mediated by the repressor of toxins
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 (TSST-1) is a superantigen (SAg) produced by Staphylococcus aureus thought to be responsible for essentially all cases of menstrual-associated toxic shock syndrome (TSS). As a potent exotoxin, it is not surprising that S. aureus has evolved multiple systems to control expression of TSST-1. Although the accessory gene regulator (Agr) system is recognized to enhance TSST-1 expression, how Agr regulates TSST-1 is unclear. Using an agr-null mutant, complementation experiments demonstrated that Agr controls TSST-1 expression through the activity of the RNAIII effector molecule. RNAIII can repress translation of the repressor of toxins (Rot) regulator, and deletion of rot increased expression of TSST-1 during the exponential phase of growth. Deletion of agr did not affect rot transcription, but did result in overexpression of the Rot protein, and Rot was also shown to bind and positively regulate the rot promoter. Overexpression of Rot dramatically repressed TSST-1, and Rot bound directly to the TSST-1 promoter. Deletion of both agr and rot in S. aureus returned TSST-1 expression to wild-type levels. This work demonstrates that Agr, although widely considered to be an inducer of TSST-1, has evolved in combination with Rot, to restrict the expression of this potent SAg.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".