MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2964122480 · doi:10.22323/1.358.0616

Search for very high energy (E > 100 GeV) Emission from Geminga supernova by VERITAS

2019· article· en· W2964122480 on OpenAlex
A. U. Abeysekara

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of 36th International Cosmic Ray Conference — PoS(ICRC2019) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysics and Gravity Measurements
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Energy Research Scientific Computing CenterU.S. Department of EnergyOffice of ScienceSmithsonian InstitutionNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsFermi Gamma-ray Space TelescopePulsarObservatorySupernovaGamma raySupernova remnantCosmic rayAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Geminga is a nearby (250 pc) middle-aged (spin-down time scale ~12,000 years) pulsar associated with a supernova remnant. Geminga has been a prime candidate for the origin of the unexpectedly high flux of cosmic-ray positrons above 10 GeV detected at Earth. Extended TeV gamma-ray emission from a 2-degree region around the Geminga pulsar was detected by the HAWC observatory, thus suggesting efficient, high-energy leptonic acceleration. Fermi-LAT observations show that the density of GeV leptons in the TeV nebula is lower than predicted by single zone and two zone diffusion models constrained with the HAWC measurements. However, the energy gap between Fermi-LAT and HAWC (~500 GeV to ~1 TeV) remains under-examined. The VERITAS gamma-ray observatory is sensitive in the energy range from 100 GeV to greater than 30 TeV, filling the gap between Fermi-LAT and HAWC. Therefore, VERITAS measurements potentially provide missing information. VERITAS has observed Geminga for 93 hours since 2009 including 28 hours in the 2018/2019 season. However, the standard VERITAS data analysis techniques have insufficient sensitivity to sources extended at the scale of the HAWC detection, due to difficulties with background estimation. We developed the Matched Runs Method (MRM) for VERITAS analysis of spatially extended sources. MRM has been demonstrated to be an effective technique by applying it to archival VERITAS data, and we are currently applying it to the Geminga observations. Here we present the summary of the MRM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.255
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it