MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2964248269 · doi:10.1145/3054948

SYM-ILDL

2017· article· en· W2964248269 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Mathematical Software · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Pennsylvania
KeywordsPreconditionerFactorizationMathematical softwareComputer scienceCode (set theory)Positive-definite matrixSymmetric matrixIncomplete LU factorizationMatching (statistics)SkewMathematicsIterative methodApplied mathematicsParallel computingComputational scienceAlgorithmSoftwareMatrix decompositionSet (abstract data type)PhysicsEigenvalues and eigenvectors

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SYM-ILDL is a numerical software package that computes incomplete LDL T (ILDL) factorizations of symmetric indefinite and real skew-symmetric matrices. The core of the algorithm is a Crout variant of incomplete LU (ILU), originally introduced and implemented for symmetric matrices by Li and Saad [2005]. Our code is economical in terms of storage, and it deals with real skew-symmetric matrices as well as symmetric ones. The package is written in C++ and is templated, is open source, and includes a M atlab ™ interface. The code includes built-in RCM and AMD reordering, two equilibration strategies, threshold Bunch-Kaufman pivoting, and rook pivoting, as well as a wrapper to MC64, a popular matching-based equilibration and reordering algorithm. We also include two built-in iterative solvers: SQMR, preconditioned with ILDL, and MINRES, preconditioned with a symmetric positive definite preconditioner based on the ILDL factorization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it