MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2964284171 · doi:10.3749/canmin.1900021

Comments on Beryl Colors and on Other Observations Regarding Iron-containing Beryls

2019· article· en· W2964284171 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lars Andersson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMineralogy and Gemology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIonOctahedronElectron paramagnetic resonanceChemistryCrystallographyCrystal (programming language)ParamagnetismTetrahedronCrystal structurePhysicsNuclear magnetic resonance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Trivalent iron ions substituting for Al3+ are present in many beryls and are abundant in dark red and dark blue beryl. These ions do not contribute any color to the crystals. Dark blue beryl also contains octahedral Fe2+ ions, which are involved in giving the crystal the blue color. The colors of dark red and dark blue beryls are very stable. Tetrahedral iron ions are practically absent in these beryls, but are present in other beryls which change their color upon irradiation and heating. Their colors depend more on the radiation and temperature history of the crystals than on chemistry. Trivalent iron ions substituting for Si4+ also do not contribute color. Rare observations by EPR (electron paramagnetic resonance) indicate that the charge difference can be compensated either by protons or by alkali ions in the beryl channels. It is shown that about 1% of the Fe3+ ions in dark red beryl substitute for Si4+. The changing colors of iron-containing beryls have been interpreted in many different ways, but it is likely that they are due to ions substituting for Be2+. The present study suggests that the iron ions do not substitute isomorphically for Be, but that they enter a distorted tetrahedron which consists of one O(1) oxygen and three O(2) oxygens. The center of this T(3) tetrahedron is at (0.432, 0.344, 0.167) in the beryl structure and the distance to the four oxygen ions is 1.84 Å, compared to 1.65 Å in the Be tetrahedron, thus providing more space for the much larger iron ions. This site is so close to the Be site that both sites cannot be simultaneously occupied. Beryl crystals with Fe2+ ions in T(3) are colorless. Irradiation oxidizes these Fe2+ ions to Fe3+, which gives the beryl a yellow color. The aquamarine color is caused by pairs of Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions in neighboring T(3) tetrahedra. When both configurations are present, the crystal assumes a shade of green, depending on their relative proportion. The electrons released by the irradiation are trapped at sites which are probably associated with water molecules in the beryl channels. These electrons leave the traps upon heating and reduce the Fe3+ ions in the T(3) tetrahedra. The yellow color vanishes and the beryl becomes aquamarine blue. More electrons are released at higher temperatures and reduce both ions of the pairs, leaving the beryl colorless. The oxidation of the iron ions at even higher temperatures is connected with the release of water from the beryl crystal. A number of small EPR signals in addition to the large signal from octahedral Fe3+ ions in iron-containing beryl crystals are investigated. Many arise from exchanged-coupled Fe3+ ion pairs, and one is related to the yellow color.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.575
Threshold uncertainty score0.742

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicMineralogy and Gemology StudiesFrench-language works237,207