EFEKTIVITAS INJEKSI INTRA-ARTIKULAR PLATELET-RICH PLASMA PADA PENDERITA OSTEOARTRITIS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Insiden penyakit Osteoartritis (OA) adalah masalah kesehatan masyarakat, ole karena itu strategi untuk mengurangi beban OA secara efektif sangat dibutuhkan.. Saat ini tidak ada strategi penanganan yang bisa menyembuhkan secara total. Penatalaksanaan terapi OA tradisional sebatas mengendalikan gejala, namun tidak dapat membalikkan kerusakan pada sendi OA. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) merupakan salah satu terapi OA yang dipercaya memiliki potensi dalam meregenerasi jaringan karena mengandung banyak growth factors yang berperan dalam proses penyembuhan. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui efektivitas terapi PRP pada penderita OA. Efektivitas injeksi dilihat berdasarkan Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) yang terdiri dari derajat nyeri, kekakuan sendi dan gangguan fungsi, serta Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan kuesioner oleh total 30 pasien OA. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terdapat perbedaan bermakna antara skor WOMAC dan VAS sebelum dilakukan injeksi dan skor WOMAC dan VAS setelah dilakukan injeksi. Kesimpulan menunjukkan bahwa injeksi intra-artikular Platelet-Rich Plasma merupakan terapi yang efektif dalam mengobati Osteoartritis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".