MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Delayed Versus Immediate Cord Clamping in Preterm Infants

2018· article· en· W2964383204 on OpenAlexaff
William Tarnow‐Mordi, Jonathan Morris, Adrienne Kirby, Kristy Robledo, Lisa Askie, R.F. Brown, Nicholas Evans, Sarah Finlayson, Michael J. Fogarty, Val Gebski, Alpana Ghadge, Wendy Hague, David Isaacs, Michelle Jeffery, Anthony Keech, Martin Kluckow, Himanshu Popat, Lucille Sebastian, Kjersti M. Aagaard, Michael A. Belfort, Mohan Pammi, Mohamed Abdellatif, Graham Reynolds, Shabina Ariff, Lumaan Sheikh, Yan Chen, Paul B. Colditz, Helen G. Liley, M. A. Pritchard, Danièle De Luca, Koert de Waal, Peta Forder, Lelia Duley, Walid El‐Naggar, Andrew Gill, John P. Newnham, Karen Simmer, Katie Groom, Philip J. Weston, Joanna Gullam, Harshad Patel, Guan Koh, Kei Lui, Neil Marlow, Scott A. Morris, Arvind Sehgal, Euan M. Wallace, Roger F. Soll, Leslie Young, David G. Sweet, Susan Walker, Andrew M. Watkins, Ian Wright, David A Osborn, John Simes

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetrical & Gynecological Survey · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineClampingCord clampingUmbilical cordCordPalpationAnesthesiaObstetricsSurgeryImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

(Abstracted from N Engl J Med 2017;377:2445–2455) Systemic reviews have shown that delaying the time of umbilical cord clamping can improve outcomes of preterm newborns. One such study found enhanced placental transfusion through delayed cord clamping, cord-palpation, or a combination of the 2 practices caused a lower infection and mortality rate when compared with immediate clamping.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.066
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.345
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.066
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.144
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueObstetrical & Gynecological SurveySame topicNeonatal Respiratory Health ResearchFrench-language works237,207