MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Bleomycin-associated lung toxicity in childhood cancer survivors.

2012· article· en· W2964501256 on OpenAlexaff
Alexandra P. Zorzi, Connie Yang, Sharon Dell, Paul C. Nathan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDLCOPulmonary function testingPulmonary toxicitySpirometryBleomycinInternal medicineLung cancerDiffusing capacityUnivariate analysisLungAsymptomaticGastroenterologyLung volumesSurgeryChemotherapyAsthma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

9591 Background: Bleomycin has been established as a pulmonary toxin, but the risk for toxicity in survivors of childhood cancer is poorly characterized. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of lung function in survivors of childhood Hodgkin lymphoma and germ cell tumor treated with bleomycin at our institution between 1997 and 2010. We assessed their most recent post-therapy pulmonary function test (PFT). Spirometry and lung volumes were categorized as normal, restrictive, obstructive or mixed. Diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO) was categorized as normal or abnormal. Results: 195 patients were treated with bleomycin. Ten died of non-pulmonary causes. Of 185 survivors, 143 (77%) had complete data available for analysis. Median cumulative bleomycin dose was 60U/m2 (IQR 30-60). Three patients (2%) had a history of acute bleomycin toxicity. PFTs were performed a median of 2.3 years (IQR 1.4-4.9) from completion of therapy. Spirometry was abnormal in 58 patients (41%); of whom 5 (9%) had respiratory symptoms. 42 (70%) had obstructive, 11 (18%) restrictive and 5 (9%) mixed ventilatory defects. Abnormalities were mild in 53 (91%), moderate in 3 (5%) and severe in 2 (4%). DLCO was abnormal in 27 patients, 26 (96%) of whom had mildly reduced DLCO and were asymptomatic. Univariate analysis did not demonstrate a significant association between gender, smoking, lung metastases, lung radiation, chemotherapy regimen, or autologous transplant and abnormal lung function. Disease relapse was associated with abnormal lung function (p=0.01). Smoking (p=0.04) and relapse (p=0.03) were associated with abnormal DLCO. The odds ratio of developing abnormal spirometry for each 1unit/m2 increase in bleomycin was 1.01 (95% CI 1.00-1.02, p=0.07). Conclusions: Childhood cancer survivors treated with bleomycin frequently have evidence of asymptomatic abnormalities on PFT. The current recommendation for pulmonary function testing in childhood cancer survivors appears justified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.506
Teacher spread0.436 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations→French-language works237,207→