MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2964577456 · doi:10.1093/arclin/acz026.46

Concussion Assessment and Return to Sport for a High School, Legally Blind, Female Swimmer

2019· article· en· W2964577456 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aimee Custer, Justin Tatman, J Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Clinical Neuropsychology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConcussionBalance (ability)PsychologyPhysical therapyMontreal Cognitive AssessmentPhysical medicine and rehabilitationMedicineCognitionPoison controlPsychiatryInjury preventionCognitive impairment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Purpose Limited research exists on treatment of sport concussion in visually impaired individuals. Adaptation to athlete’s needs is vital for individualized sport specific return to play (RTP). Methods Fifteen year-old, visually impaired, female, swimmer presented to an interdisciplinary Sport Concussion Program for protracted recovery with complaints of disequilibrium, headaches, cognitive fatigue, and exacerbation of premorbid resting nystagmus after being kicked in the head during practice. Patient is legally blind due to Peter’s Anomaly and right retinal detachment, with history of migraine, carsickness, and glaucoma. Patient completed two visits with clinical sports neuropsychologist and three vestibular therapy (VT) appointments, assessed via Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-BLIND), Modified Balance Error Scoring System (mBESS), Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), Activities-Specific Balance Confidence scale (ABC), Buffalo Concussion Treadmill Test (BCTT), and Children's Memory Scales (CMS). Differential Diagnosis: Concussion, Post-Concussion Syndrome, Post-Traumatic Headache, Vestibular Dysfunction. Results Initial consult revealed PCSS of 35 and normal MoCA-BLIND (18/22). Patient’s mBESS improved from 7 to 3 errors with VT, DHI mildly elevated (36%), ABC moderately elevated (43%). VT consisted of: neuromuscular re-education, balance training, positional changes, cognitive activity, sport specific RTP progressions (dry land modifications, transitions into water, communication to team athletic trainer). BCTT passed on third VT visit. Patient cleared for RTP with PCSS at 7 and (CMS) Stories, Word Lists, Numbers, and Sequences subtests within expectations (average to high average ranges). Conclusion This case study illustrates an interdisciplinary approach to concussion treatment with modification of established tools and proposal of sport specific RTP guidelines for visually impaired athletes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.492
Teacher spread0.371 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives of Clinical NeuropsychologySame topicTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207