MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2964765099 · doi:10.1111/nmo.13691

High occurrence of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in primary biliary cholangitis

2019· article· en· W2964765099 on OpenAlexaff
Jeremy Liu Chen Kiow, Catherine Vincent, Sacha Sidani, Mickaël Bouin

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurogastroenterology & Motility · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Diseases and Immunity
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSmall intestinal bacterial overgrowthGastroenterologyInternal medicineMedicineBloatingHydrogen breath testIrritable bowel syndromePrimary biliary cirrhosisIntestinal permeabilityLactuloseBreath testAbdominal painDiarrheaBody mass index

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic autoimmune liver disease affecting mainly middle-aged women. An alteration in intestinal motility has been well documented in cirrhosis predisposing to small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). Patients with PBC frequently complain of various gastrointestinal symptoms compatible with SIBO. No study has specifically been published to this day to determine the occurrence of SIBO in PBC. Our objective was to determine the prevalence of SIBO in patients with PBC. METHODS: Retrospective study from 2010 to 2018. All patients diagnosed with PBC during this period had a systematic screening for SIBO in their diagnostic workup. The diagnosis of SIBO was made by a carbohydrate breath test (lactulose and/or glucose). Clinical and paraclinical factors of patients were compared with a control group of healthy subjects. KEY RESULTS: Ninety-eight subjects were included in the study (mean age 49, range 21-88 years) including 58 patients with PBC and 40 healthy subjects. The PBC group was older than the control group (mean age 56, range 31-88 vs 39, range 21-62 years; P < .001), but identical for gender and body mass index. The prevalence of SIBO was higher in PBC versus controls (32.8% vs 2.5%; P < .001). The PBC group with SIBO had significantly more diarrhea (78.9% vs 35.9%; P < .05) than the PBC group without SIBO, but the prevalence of abdominal pain and bloating was similar. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: The high occurrence of SIBO in PBC may explain some of the frequently reported gastrointestinal symptoms. This study justifies the systematic screening for SIBO in PBC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.693

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurogastroenterology & MotilitySame topicLiver Diseases and ImmunityFrench-language works237,207