Bibliographic record
Abstract
La notion libertine du « moment » apparut chez Crébillon vers 1730, puis elle fut reprise, précisée ou infléchie au fil du siècle, jusque vers 1800, par Duclos, Dorat, Laclos, Denon et Mirabeau, entre autres. Or, ce concept fuyant, aux contours indécis, semble échapper aux définitions nettes. Cet article s’attarde à caractériser le moment libertin selon les termes mêmes des personnages romanesques qui le théorisent ou y recourent dans leurs entreprises amoureuses. Nous distinguons d’abord les notions voisines de « moment » et d’« occasion » ; nous exposons ensuite les sortes de moment ; puis nous en examinons les causes et les effets, tant physiologiques que psychiques ; enfin nous montrons le rôle paradoxal du moment dans la théorie libertine. En définitive, le moment marque la fracture entre l’esthétique mondaine et l’éthique guerrière, la tension entre le raffinement et la violence dans la séduction, et dissimule le plus souvent une domination sexuelle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".