MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Influence of nasal CPAP on cardiorespiratory control in healthy neonate

2019· article· en· W2964831380 on OpenAlexaff
Sally Al-Omar, Virginie Le Rolle, Patrick Pladys, Nathalie Samson, Alfredo Hernández, Guy Carrault, Jean‐Paul Praud

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physiology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCardiorespiratory fitnessContinuous positive airway pressureVagal toneHeart rateRespiratory systemMedicineAnesthesiaHeart rate variabilityExpirationRespiratory rateVentilation (architecture)CardiologyBlood pressureInternal medicineObstructive sleep apnea

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study aimed to further unravel the effects of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) on the cardiovascular and respiratory systems in the neonatal period. Six-hour polysomnographic recordings were first performed in seven healthy newborn lambs, aged 2–3 days, without and with nCPAP application at 6 cmH2O (nCPAP-6), in randomized order. The effects of nCPAP-6 on heart rate variability, respiratory rate variability, and cardiorespiratory interrelations were analyzed using a semiautomatic signal processing approach applied to ECG and respiration recordings. Thereafter, a cardiorespiratory mathematical model was adapted to the experimental conditions to gain further physiological interpretation and to simulate higher nCPAP levels (8 and 10 cmH2O). Results from the signal processing approach suggest that nCPAP-6 applied in newborns with healthy lungs: 1) increases heart rate and decreases the time and frequency domain indices of heart rate variability, especially those representing parasympathetic activity, while increasing the complexity of the RR-interval time series; 2) prolongs the respiratory cycle and expiration duration and decreases respiratory rate variability; and 3) slightly impairs cardiorespiratory interrelations. Model-based analysis revealed that nCPAP-6 increases the heart rate and decreases respiratory sinus arrhythmia amplitude, in association with a reduced parasympathetic efferent activity. These results were accentuated when simulating an increased CPAP level. Overall, our results provide a further understanding of the effects of nCPAP in neonates, in the absence of lung disease. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Application of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) at 6 cmH2O, a level very frequently used in newborns, alters heart and respiratory rate variability, as well as cardiorespiratory interrelations in a full-term newborn model without lung disease. Moreover, whereas nasal CPAP at 6 cmH2O decreases parasympathetic efferent activity, there is no change in sympathetic efferent activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysiologySame topicNeuroscience of respiration and sleepFrench-language works237,207