X-ray Crystallographic Structure and Oligomerization of Gloeobacter Rhodopsin
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gloeobacter rhodopsin (GR) is a cyanobacterial proton pump which can be potentially applied to optogenetics. We solved the crystal structure of GR and found that it has overall similarity to the homologous proton pump from Salinibacter ruber, xanthorhodopsin (XR). We identified distinct structural characteristics of GR's hydrogen bonding network in the transmembrane domain as well as the displacement of extracellular sides of the transmembrane helices relative to those of XR. Employing Raman spectroscopy and flash-photolysis, we found that GR in the crystals exists in a state which displays retinal conformation and photochemical cycle similar to the functional form observed in lipids. Based on the crystal structure of GR, we selected a site for spin labeling to determine GR's oligomerization state using double electron-electron resonance (DEER) spectroscopy and demonstrated the pH-dependent pentamer formation of GR. Determination of the structure of GR as well as its pentamerizing propensity enabled us to reveal the role of structural motifs (extended helices, 3-omega motif and flipped B-C loop) commonly found among light-driven bacterial pumps in oligomer formation. Here we propose a new concept to classify these pumps based on the relationship between their oligomerization propensities and these structural determinants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it