MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2964942934 · doi:10.1109/icorr.2019.8779533

Design of User-Independent Hand Gesture Recognition Using Multilayer Perceptron Networks and Sensor Fusion Techniques

2019· article· en· W2964942934 on OpenAlexaff
J. Guillermo Colli Alfaro, Anas Ibrahim, Ana Luisa Trejos

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInertial measurement unitGestureWearable computerComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceRobotMechatronicsGesture recognitionInterface (matter)PerceptronSensor fusionArtificial neural networkHuman–computer interactionEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

According to the World Health Organization, stroke is the third leading cause of disability. A common consequence of stroke is hemiparesis, which leads to the impairment of one side of the body and affects the performance of activities of daily living. It has been proven that targeting the motor impairments as early as possible while using wearable mechatronic devices as a robot assisted therapy, and letting the patient be in control of the robotic system, can improve the rehabilitation outcomes. However, despite the increased progress on control methods for wearable mechatronic devices, a need for a more natural interface that allows for better control remains. In this work, a user-independent gesture classification method based on a sensor fusion technique using surface electromyography (EMG) and an inertial measurement unit (IMU) is presented. The Myo Armband was used to extract EMG and IMU data from healthy subjects. Participants were asked to perform 10 types of gestures in 4 different arm positions while using the Myo on their dominant limb. Data obtained from 14 participants were used to classify the gestures using a Multilayer Perceptron Network. Finally, the classification algorithm was tested on 5 novel users, obtaining an average accuracy of 78.94%. These results demonstrate that by using the proposed approach, it is possible to achieve a more natural human machine interface that allows better control of wearable mechatronic devices during robot assisted therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.571
Threshold uncertainty score0.399

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMuscle activation and electromyography studiesFrench-language works237,207