Design of User-Independent Hand Gesture Recognition Using Multilayer Perceptron Networks and Sensor Fusion Techniques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
According to the World Health Organization, stroke is the third leading cause of disability. A common consequence of stroke is hemiparesis, which leads to the impairment of one side of the body and affects the performance of activities of daily living. It has been proven that targeting the motor impairments as early as possible while using wearable mechatronic devices as a robot assisted therapy, and letting the patient be in control of the robotic system, can improve the rehabilitation outcomes. However, despite the increased progress on control methods for wearable mechatronic devices, a need for a more natural interface that allows for better control remains. In this work, a user-independent gesture classification method based on a sensor fusion technique using surface electromyography (EMG) and an inertial measurement unit (IMU) is presented. The Myo Armband was used to extract EMG and IMU data from healthy subjects. Participants were asked to perform 10 types of gestures in 4 different arm positions while using the Myo on their dominant limb. Data obtained from 14 participants were used to classify the gestures using a Multilayer Perceptron Network. Finally, the classification algorithm was tested on 5 novel users, obtaining an average accuracy of 78.94%. These results demonstrate that by using the proposed approach, it is possible to achieve a more natural human machine interface that allows better control of wearable mechatronic devices during robot assisted therapies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".