MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A phase I study of R04929097, an oral gamma secretase inhibitor, in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors (PHL-078/CTEP 8575).

2012· article· en· W2965042402 on OpenAlexaff
Sue Richter, Elaine McWhirter, Eric Xueyu Chen, Ben Tran, Sebastién J. Hotte, Anastasios Stathis, Hal W. Hirte, Albiruni R. Abdul Razak, Anne Laughlin, Lisa Wang, Kristina Battista, Lee-Anne Stayner, S. Percy Ivy, Malcolm J. Moore, Amit M. Oza, Lillian L. Siu, Philippe L. Bédard

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoJuravinski Cancer CentrePrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGemcitabineTolerabilityNauseaVomitingInternal medicinePharmacokineticsGastroenterologyAdverse effectToxicityOncologyPharmacologyCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3082 Background: RO4929097 (RO) is an oral inhibitor of γ-secretase that disrupts Notch signaling. Gemcitabine (GEM) is active against many solid tumors with a favorable toxicity profile suited to combination. The primary objective of this trial is to establish the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of RO in combination with GEM; secondary objectives include the evaluation of safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), biomarkers of Notch signaling and preliminary anti-tumor activity. Methods: Patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors were enrolled in escalating RO dose levels (DL) as follows: DL1 20mg, DL2 30mg; DL3 45mg and DL4 90mg using a 3+3 design. Treatment with RO was administered once daily on days (d) 1-3, 8-10, 15-17, 22-24 and GEM 1000mg/m2 on d1, 8, and 15 in 28d cycles (c). Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) during c1 were defined as CTCAE v4 grade (g) 3 non-hematological or g4 hematological toxicities, failure to start c2 within <14 days, or failure to receive ≥75% doses of RO or d8 GEM in c1. Serial plasma samples for RO PK were collected on d1 and 10. Results: As of January 2012, 15 pts (median age 55) have been treated. DLTs were: DL1 0/3, DL2 1/7 (g3 ALT), DL3 0/3, DL4 2/2 (g3 AST/ALT and failure to receive ³75% doses); all were reversible. One death (perforated viscus) related to disease progression was observed. Most common g1/2 toxicities were nausea (9), vomiting (6), fatigue (5), hypophosphatemia (5), transaminitis (3) hypomagnasemia (2) and maculopapular rash (2). G3 hypophosphatemia (1) was observed beyond C1. RO PKs demonstrated comparable exposures at 30mg and 45mg (Table). Best response (RECIST 1.1) was stable disease > 4 months in 3 pts (pancreas, tracheal, breast CA). Conclusions: RO and GEM can be safely combined. RO levels achieved exceeded the AUC0-24 for efficacy in preclinical models using daily dosing. The maximum tolerated dose was exceeded at 90mg RO. Dose expansion at 45mg RO is ongoing to confirm the RP2D. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.484
Teacher spread0.411 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicCancer Treatment and PharmacologyFrench-language works237,207