MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2965095822 · doi:10.1088/1361-648x/ab5595

Resonant inelastic x-ray scattering study of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mstyle> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> </mml:mstyle> </mml:math> -RuCl <sub>3</sub> : a progress report

2019· article· en· W2965095822 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Condensed Matter · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetism in coordination complexes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersBasic Energy SciencesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOffice of ScienceUniversity of TorontoDivision of PhysicsOntario Innovation TrustAspen Center for PhysicsCanada Foundation for InnovationBrookhaven National LaboratoryU.S. Department of EnergyFaculty of Arts and SciencesNational Science Foundation
KeywordsResonant inelastic X-ray scatteringScatteringInelastic scatteringDistortion (music)ExcitonCoupling (piping)Resolution (logic)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

-edge resonant inelastic x-ray scattering (RIXS) measurements of [Formula: see text] with 27 meV resolution reveals a spin-orbit exciton without noticeable splitting. We extract values for the spin-orbit coupling constant ([Formula: see text] meV) and trigonal distortion field energy ([Formula: see text] meV) which support the [Formula: see text] nature of [Formula: see text]. We demonstrate the feasibility of M-edge RIXS for 4d systems, which allows ultra high-resolution RIXS of 4d systems until instrumentation for L-edge RIXS improves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.224
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it