Short‐term response of fish communities and water chemistry to breaching of a causeway in the Sarita River Estuary, British Columbia, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On the west coast of Vancouver Island, Canada, in the Treaty Settlement Lands of the Huu‐ay‐aht First Nation, a causeway isolating the southern portion of the Sarita River estuary was breached in 2018 to enhance juvenile salmon and tidal water access into the southern portion of the estuary. Short‐term goals of breaching were to: (1) enhance juvenile salmon access through the causeway; (2) promote colonization of Chinook and Chum Salmon in pools, while retaining Coho Salmon; (3) monitor the entire estuary fish community, including non‐salmonids, to assess breaching success; and (4) homogenize water chemistry in pool and channel ecosystems currently fragmented by the causeway. Immediately following the breach, both fish community and water chemistry measurements indicate that these goals were achieved. Chinook and Chum Salmon utilization increased inside and outside of the causeway following breaching. Similarly, Chinook and Chum salmon were observed in pool ecosystems, and Coho Salmon were also retained in pools following breaching. Water chemistry was homogenized post‐breach, primarily due to increased saltwater penetration. While continued monitoring is required, short‐term indicators suggest that breaching was effective in increasing connectivity of the Sarita Estuary, allowing access to 1.4 km2 of habitat that had previously been inaccessible to juvenile salmon.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".