Copyright’s Role in Preserving and Ensuring Access to Culture: The Way Forward
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Copyright has traditionally been concerned with balancing economic incentives with creative opportunity and innovation. When purely economic interests are the primary or sole drivers in directing control over cultural works, culture itself is threatened. The danger to global culture is increased when a single culture is able to dominate both policy and regulation. What may be beneficial for a developed country may not be beneficial for a developing country, and in fact, what may be beneficial for a developed country may have disastrous effects on developing countries’ ability to access or exploit their own Intellectual Property. Canada’s experience in protecting its cultural heritage can be illustrative for other countries. Copyright has traditionally been supported with a strong commitment to fostering Canadian Culture through the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission and Canadian content requirements. Access and nurturing culture must also be facilitated through the regulation of telecommunications, especially in an ever expanding global, digital environment. Canada’s 2019 review of the Copyright Act must take into account the changing global landscape to ensure that Canadian voices can still be heard. Traditionnellement, le domaine du copyright s’intéresse à l’équilibre entre des incitations économiques et l’opportunité créative et l’innovation. Lorsque les intérêts purement économiques sont les seuls ou les principaux facteurs dans la direction d’autorité sur les oeuvres culturelles, la culture est menacée elle-même. Le risque pour la culture mondiale augmente quand une seule culture peut dominer à la fois la politique et la réglementation. Ce qui pourrait bénéficier à un pays développé pourrait s’avérer nuisible à un pays émergent et, en fait, ce qui bénéficie à un pays développé peut cependant produire des effets désastreux pour des pays émergents, ayant un effet sur leur capabilité d’accéder ou d’exploiter leur propre propriété intellectuelle. L’expérience vécue par le Canada concernant la protection de son héritage culturel peut servir d’exemple parlant pour d’autres pays. Le Canada a toujours soutenu le copyright avec un engagement fort qui promeut la culture canadienne grâce au Conseil de la radiodiffusion et des télécommunications canadiennes et aux exigences de contenu canadien. Il faut aussi faciliter l’accès et l’encouragement de la culture à travers des règlements de télécommunications, surtout vu l’environnement numérique mondial en expansion permanente. L’examen de la Loi sur le droit d’auteur, entrepris par le Canada en 2019, doit tenir compte de la situation mondiale changeante afin de garantir que les voix canadiennes puissent encore être entendues. <strong>Mots-clés:</strong> Culture; télécommunications; médias; Internet
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".