An Empirical Evaluation of the Link between Women Participation in Village Savings and Loans Association (VSLA) and Poverty Reduction in Ethiopia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Como assinala Jordi B o r ja 1, "o termo movimento urbano é extraordina riam ente genérico. Seu único valor reside em assinalar a existência de um tipo de conflitos sociais que a té uma época re cente não tin h am especificidade nem científica nem política”. É exatam ente n a busca de ta l especificidade que se vai situ a r a lite ra tu ra mais recente sobre o tema. Nela, a chamada Questão Urbana 2 é vista em um de seus aspectos específicos ”” a eclosão de movimentos sociais urbanos a p a rtir de contradições geradas pelo próprio desenvolvimento do capitalismo. A lite ra tu ra que tr a ta do tem a 8 procura discutir as questões teóricas e políticas que embasam a problemática, ao lado de entender eventos tão diversos quanto a luta dos negros americanos p a ra impedir a demolição de grande p a rte do gueto de Newark, em Nova Jersey, o movimento ecológico nos Estados Unidos, 0 movimento dos “pobladores” no Chile, a organização de uma fe sta p a ra evitar a demolição dos pavilhões do Les Halles em Paris e a onda de quebra
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".