MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2965427314 · doi:10.1017/9781787441392.010

<i>Verfremdung</i> and Ethics in Brecht's <i>Der Jasager / Der Neinsager</i>

2019· book-chapter· de· W2965427314 on OpenAlexaffabout
Elena Pnevmonidou

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languagede
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature and Cultural Memory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermanDramaExperiential learningPedagogyArtSociologyPsychologyLiteratureLinguisticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Through an examination of the ethical constellations in Bertolt Brecht's Der Jasager / Der Neinsager , this article develops an approach for teaching Brecht that engages philosophically with his core concepts of the Verfremdungseffekt and Gestus while also exploring their practical application as tools for literary analysis and as dramaturgical intentions in theater performance. To that end, the article frames the examination of the play in a broader theoretical discussion of Brecht's theater and also draws from a concrete teaching experience, the workshop production of Der Jasager / Der Neinsager on December 4 and 5, 2012, by the students in the course “Performing German Drama” offered in the Department of Germanic and Slavic Studies at the University of Victoria, Canada. This is a unique hybrid course open to both nonspeakers and speakers of German and taught in a bilingual setting. Combining theater history and performance, it provides an experiential, collaborative learning environment in which students collectively develop a dramaturgical approach for a German play based on textual analysis and research of the relevant culture, theater, and performance history, and then stage a workshop production of the play in German. This course experience is relevant for the present study beyond the mere fact that students staged a play by Brecht. With its emphasis on the workshop process, its bilingual educational setting, and the blending of theater history with performance, the course takes both language learners and theater students out of their respective comfort zones and is to some extent methodologically modeled after the Brechtian Lehrstück , regardless of what play is staged in any given year. As a genre, the Lehrstück is positioned at the intersection of theory and practice and is designed for self-aware, critical engagement with the theater method by performative means rather than the mere application of a method for the sake of a performance. Given that in this particular instance the task was to stage a Lehrstück , this meant that the course participants needed to develop a dramaturgical approach for their production of Der Jasager / Der Neinsager that would make that performative engagement with Brecht's theater method demonstrably part of the production itself.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0090.026
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLiterature and Cultural MemoryFrench-language works237,207