Using Plasma Focused Ion Beam Microscopy to Characterize 3D Structure and Porosity of OPC Mortar
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Journal Article Using Plasma Focused Ion Beam Microscopy to Characterize 3D Structure and Porosity of OPC Mortar Get access Peng Dong, Peng Dong Department of Materials Science and Engineering and Canadian Centre for Electron Microscopy, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Ali Allahverdi, Ali Allahverdi School of Chemical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Hui Yuan, Hui Yuan Department of Materials Science and Engineering and Canadian Centre for Electron Microscopy, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Nabil D Bassim Nabil D Bassim Department of Materials Science and Engineering and Canadian Centre for Electron Microscopy, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada Corresponding author: bassimn@mcmaster.ca Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Microscopy and Microanalysis, Volume 25, Issue S2, 1 August 2019, Pages 926–927, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927619005361 Published: 01 August 2019
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".