MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2965554361 · doi:10.14745/ccdr.v44i10a05

Outbreak of Salmonella Chailey infections linked to precut coconut pieces — United States and Canada, 2017

2018· article· en· W2965554361 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Sarah Luna, Marsha Taylor, Eleni Galanis, Rod Asplin, Jasmine Huffman, Darlene Wagner, Linda Hoang, Ana Paccagnella, Susan Shelton, Stephen Ladd-Wilson, Sharon L. Seelman, Brooke M. Whitney, Elisa L. Elliot, Robin Atkinson, Katherine E. Marshall, Colin Basler

Bibliographic record

VenueCanada Communicable Disease Report · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Safety and Hygiene
Canadian institutionsCanadian Food Inspection AgencyFraser HealthBC Centre for Disease Control
FundersPublic Health AgencyPublic Health Agency of CanadaCanadian Food Inspection Agency
KeywordsOutbreakSalmonellaSalmonella Food PoisoningMedicineEnvironmental healthGeographyBiologyVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Foodborne salmonellosis causes an estimated one million illnesses and 400 deaths annually in the United States (US).During March-May 2017, an outbreak of 19 cases of Salmonella Chailey associated with precut coconut pieces from a single grocery store chain occurred in the United States and Canada.The chain voluntarily recalled precut coconut pieces.This was the first time that coconut has been associated with a Salmonella outbreak in the United States or Canada.In recent years, salmonellosis outbreaks have been caused by foods not typically associated with Salmonella.Raw coconut should now be considered in investigations of Salmonella outbreaks among fresh food consumers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.144

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanada Communicable Disease ReportSame topicFood Safety and HygieneFrench-language works237,207