Assessment of diagnostic methods for imported malaria in mainland France
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
The three-model screen
all 1,000 screened works →All three models called this out of scope.
Assessment of diagnostic methods for imported malaria; diagnostic accuracy in clinical practice, no abstract available.
The title indicates a clinical review of malaria diagnostic methods, but the missing abstract prevents firmer judgment.
Title points to clinical assessment of malaria diagnostic methods; no abstract, domain medicine not metaresearch.
Abstract
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database — OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
The record
- Venue
- Médecine et Maladies Infectieuses
- Topic
- Malaria Research and Control
- Field
- Medicine
- Canadian institutions
- —
- Funders
- University of Calgary
- Keywords
- MalariaMainlandGeographyMedicineImmunologyArchaeology
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- no