MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The role of advanced genetic testing in the management of prostate cancer post radical prostatectomy.

2013· article· en· W2965677442 on OpenAlexaff
Edward M. Schaeffer, Ismael A. Vergara, Anamaria Crisan, Nicholas Erho, Mercedeh Ghadessi, Felix Y. Feng, Elai Davicioni, Ashley E. Ross

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsGenome British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineProstate cancerProstatectomyInternal medicineOncologyERCC1CancerDNA repair

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

5089 Background: The genomic classifier (Decipher, GC) is a prospectively validated assay that predicts clinical metastasis post radical prostatectomy (RP) more accurately than standard clinicopathologic factors. While over 70% of high risk patients tested in a previous validation had low GC scores and good prognosis, patients with high GC scores had a cumulative incidence of metastasis over 25% over the study duration. Among men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer, these most at risk patients may derive the greatest benefit from novel therapies. We thus examined differential expression (DE) of druggable genes that may be targeted in this group. Methods: High-density microarray expression profiles of primary FFPE tumor specimens from 764 men treated with RP at the Mayo Clinic (1987-2006) were evaluated. A subset of 323 patients was flagged as high risk of clinical metastasis (mets) by virtue of having GC score ≥ 0.4. Enrichment and identification of DE genes as druggable targets were pursued using DAVID and DrugBank. Results: Median follow-up of patients was 15.1 years. Among the 323 patients with high GC scores, 62% had mets during follow-up.We identified 2,262 genes DE between mets and non-mets, 230 of which are associated with 331 approved pharmaceuticals and 547 experimental agents. These agents included multiple established anti-neoplastic therapies not currently used to treat prostate cancer such as bortezomib, capecitabine, dasatinib, etoposide, gemcitabine, imatinib, irinotecan, pemetrexed and vinblastine. The two most enriched pathways, spliceosome and ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis, have been proposed previously as therapeutic targets in cancer. Conclusions: Advanced genomic testing that includes validated molecular risk scores as well as transcriptome profiling from a single assay may better enable application of directed, multimodal therapy for individual patients with high risk prostate cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.463
Teacher spread0.392 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→