AHEAD: A Tool for Projecting Next-Generation Hardware Enhancements on GPU-Accelerated Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Starting with the Titan supercomputer (at the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility, OLCF) in 2012, top supercomputers have Increasingly leveraged the performance of GPUs to support large-scale computational science. The current No. 1 machine, the 200 petaflop Summit system at OLCF, is a GPU-based machine. Accelerator-based architectures, however, add additional complexity due to node heterogeneity. To inform procurement decisions, supercomputing centers need the tools to quickly model the impact of changes of the node architectures on application performance. We present AHEAD, a profiling and modeling tool to quantify the impact of intra-node communication mechanism (e.g., PCI or NVLink) on application performance. Our experiments show average weighted relative errors of ~19% and ~23% for five CORAL-2 (a collaboration between multiple US Department of Energy, DOE, labs to procure Exascale systems) and 12 Rodinia benchmarks respectively, without running the applications on the target future node.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".