MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2965835870 · doi:10.1021/acsomega.9b01560

Systematic Probing of the Sequence Selectivity of Exonuclease III with a Photosensitization Colorimetric Assay

2019· article· en· W2965835870 on OpenAlexaff
Yu Ding, Xianming Li, Xinfeng Zhang, Feng Li, Xiandeng Hou, Peng Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Omega · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsBrock University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCleaveExonucleaseDNACleavage (geology)Sequence (biology)BioassayExonuclease IIISelectivityChemistryComputational biologyGeneBiologyCombinatorial chemistryStereochemistryMolecular biologyBiochemistryGeneticsEscherichia coliPolymerase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exonuclease III (Exo III) is an important enzymatic tool that is being widely used in molecular biology, biotechnology, and bioassay development. Exo III prefers to cleave double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) with blunt and recessed 3'-termini rather than their protruding counterpart. While it has been accepted that a short 3'-overhang (e.g., >4 nt) is necessary to protect a dsDNA from Exo III cleavage, critical roles of the length and sequence of this 3'-overhang remain unexplored. Herein, we develop a novel light-induced colorimetric assay allowing the systematic probe of the sequence selectivity of Exo III in a rapid and high-throughput manner. Our finding that Exo III is highly specific to 3'-overhang in terms of both length and sequence will be valuable for guiding the design of bioassays and DNA manipulating tools mediated by Exo III.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.236

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS OmegaSame topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniquesFrench-language works237,207