Quelques fragments d'une théorie de la traduction: Paul Valéry traducteur
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Moins traducteur et moins theoricien de la traduction que certains de ses contemporains, Paul Valery n'en fut pas moins seduit par l'idee de traduire certains textes qui lui tenaient a coeur et de reflechir au processus de la traduction. Et quand George Steiner dresse la liste, dans son important ouvrage Apres Babel, de ceux qui ont dit quelque chose de fondamental ou d'original sur la traduction, il n'inclut pas, curieusement, le nom de Gide, connu pourtant pour ses traductions de Shakespeare, Blake et Conrad, ainsi que pour ses ecrits sur la traduction comme sa« Lettre-Preface» a l'edition bilingue de Hamlet, pas plus que celui de Valery Larbaud, a la fois traducteur et theoricien, collaborateur de Valery a la revue Commerce, auteur du celebre Sous l'invocation de saint Jerome (1946), mais il inclut celui de Paul Valery:[...]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.042 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".