Acoustic Design of Reconstructed Banff Pavilion of Frank Lloyd Wright
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The late Frank Lloyd Wright designed and through an Alberta architect installed a pavilion in Banff, Alberta within the Parks Canada's land. The pavilion was built in the prairie style with a gathering space, washrooms and minimal food services. Built in 1916, it was used only in the summer. However, it was demolished in 1933 due to damage from two major floods. A group of Wright aficionados is very keen to get the pavilion rebuilt with the aim of preserving the original design. The group retained seven Ryerson University academics to study the feasibility of recreating the pavilion with the stipulation that the space can be used all through the year. One of the envisaged uses of the space is a small concert hall in the main meeting space. The original and reconstructed pavilion space uses materials such as glass, stones and concrete. The envelope materials are highly reflective. The acoustical response of the space was simulated in ODEON for different scenarios. One short jazz piece, Autumn Leaves, was used to generate wave files by conducting auralization through OdeOn. Based on the responses movable acoustic panels were designed to produce acceptable concert hall from an acoustic perspective. The results of the acoustic simulations will be presented in this paper.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it