MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2965988150 · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000016560

Predictive value of CHA2DS2-VASc scores regarding the risk of stroke and all-cause mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation (CONSORT compliant)

2019· article· en· W2965988150 on OpenAlexaff
Andrea Gažová, John J. Leddy, Mária Rexová, Peter Hlivák, Róbert Hatala, Ján Kyselovič

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAtrial fibrillationInternal medicineStroke (engine)Heart failureCHA2DS2–VASc scoreDiabetes mellitusIncidence (geometry)CardiologyRetrospective cohort studyIschemic stroke

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have a higher risk of fatal complications (e.g., stroke). This investigation was performed as an observational retrospective cohort study includes 137 patients (age 61 ± 15; 34.3% women) with a primary diagnosis of AF (paroxysmal, persistent, and permanent). METHODS: We collected information about the drug therapy, comorbidities and survival of AF patients and determined their congestive heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke or TIA or thromboembolism, vascular disease, age, sex category (CHA2DS2-VASc) scores. Statistical analysis identified patients with high CHA2DS2-VASc scores and defined the predictive value of individual parameters, or their combination, with regards to the outcomes of stroke and mortality. RESULTS: CHA2DS2-VASc scores identified 43.8% of the patients as low to intermediate risk (score 0-1) and 56.2% of the patients as high risk (score ≥2). Increasing CHA2DS2-VASc scores were not only accompanied by an increase in the incidence of stroke (Ptrend < .001) but also by an increase in the 3 to 5 years mortality (P = .005). Comparison of anticoagulation and anti-aggregation treatment between the 3 groups of AF did not show any significant statistical difference. Highly significant predictors of death were the CHA2DS2-VASc score (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.10-2.67, P < .017) as well as other risk factors not included in the CHA2DS2-VASc score such as valvular heart disease (OR 5.04, 95% CI 1.10-23.10, P = .037), hyperlipidemia (OR 4.82, 95% CI 1.03-22.63, P = .046) and chronic renal failure (OR 14.21, 95% CI 2.41-83.91, P = .003). The type of AF type did not affect survival (P = .158) nor the incidence of stroke (P = .466). Patients with paroxysmal AF were linked to significantly lower frequencies of ischemic heart disease (P < .0001), vascular disease (P = .002), diabetes mellitus (P = .047), valvular heart disease (P = .03) and heart failure/left ventricular dysfunction (P = .015). CONCLUSION: The CHA2DS2-VASc score correctly predicted the patients at high-risk for 3 to 5 years mortality and confirmed its significant predictive value in the patients with AF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.290

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations57
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicineSame topicAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207