MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2966024756 · doi:10.1109/isie.2019.8781142

A Novel Adaptive Control of Three-Phase Inverter for Standalone Distributed Generation System Using Modified Super-Twisting Algorithm with Time Delay Estimation

2019· article· en· W2966024756 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed-Hamza Laraki, Brahim Brahmi, Ambrish Chandra, Kodjo Agbossou, Alben Cardenasgonzalez

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceInverterControl theory (sociology)Phase (matter)Phase controlAlgorithmAdaptive controlControl (management)EngineeringArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsVoltageElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Distributed Generation (DG) systems, such as renewable energy sources and fuel cells are widely used for standalone microgrids to complement fossil fuel generators. However, these systems still suffer from various problems such as dynamics uncertainties, external disturbances, and imprecision of the system parameters. In this paper, we present a new Integral super-twisting Terminal Sliding Mode Control incorporating Time Delay Estimation (STA-TDE) applied to Three-Phase Inverter for Standalone Distributed Generation System with dynamics uncertainties and unknown bounded disturbances. Unlike conventional adaptive approaches, the proposed Time Delay Estimation uses delayed one step only of the control input and outputs of the system to approximate the uncertain dynamics. A finite time of both selected sliding surface and estimation error simultaneous is achieved using an appropriate Lyapunov function. Numerical simulation results found to confirm the effectiveness of the proposed control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.795
Threshold uncertainty score0.569

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207