Back to Normal: Direct Evidence of the Cretan Detachment as a North‐Directed Normal Fault During the Miocene
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The Cretan Detachment represents a major tectonic contact between an Alpine high‐pressure Lower Nappe System in the footwall and an Alpine unmetamorphosed Upper Nappe System in the hanging wall. Interestingly, the kinematics and the tectonic nature of this contact is still highly controversial and has been interpreted either as a top‐to‐the S thrust or as a normal fault with top‐to‐the N and/or top‐to‐the S displacement sense. Whereas some models suggest exhumation of the high‐pressure rocks synchronous with out‐of‐sequence thrusting or Himalayan‐type extrusion tectonics, other models propose that Crete represents a metamorphic core complex that exhumed below the extensional Cretan Detachment. In this work, we show that the Cretan Detachment in eastern Crete is an up to 100‐m‐thick cataclastic low‐angle fault zone, which localized below the Tripolitza Unit (Upper Nappe System) within the upper part of the Upper Violet Slates (top of Lower Nappe System) cutting downsection to lower structural levels. The unequivocal kinematic indicators in this fault zone clearly suggest a top‐to‐the N displacement of the hanging wall. New low‐temperature geochronological data and numerical modeling suggest rapid cooling of the rocks in the footwall of the Cretan Detachment at circa 15 Ma. Top‐to‐the S ductile shear sense toward lower structural level in the Lower Nappe System support the idea that the Cretan Detachment facilitated the exhumation of the high‐pressure rocks in an extrusion tectonic setting. Therefore, in the early to middle Miocene, subduction‐related extrusion in Crete was simultaneously active with back‐arc extension‐related metamorphic core formation in the Cyclades.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".