Detection of pathogenic Escherichia coli on potentially contaminated beef carcasses using cassette PCR and conventional PCR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Over a one year period, swabs of 820 beef carcasses were tested for the presence of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli by performing Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in a novel technology termed "cassette PCR", in comparison to conventional liquid PCR. Cassette PCR is inexpensive and ready-to-use. The operator need only add the sample and press "go". Cassette PCR can simultaneously test multiple samples for multiple targets. Carcass swab samples were first tested for the presence of STEC genes (O157, eae, stx1 and stx2). Samples were considered to be pathogenic if positive for eae plus stx1 and/or stx2. For samples scored as pathogenic, further testing screened for 6 additional high frequency O-antigens (O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, and O145). RESULTS: Of the 820 samples, 41% were pathogenic and 30% were O157 positive. Of these, 19% of samples were positive for O157 and carried potentially pathogenic E. coli (eae plus stx1 and/or stx2). Of all samples identified as carrying pathogenic E. coli, 18.9, 38.8, 41.4, 0, 36.1, and 4.1% respectively were positive for O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, and O145. To validate cassette PCR testing, conventional PCR using STEC primers was performed on each of the 820 samples. Only 148 of 3280 cassette PCR tests were discordant with conventional PCR results. However, further fractional testing showed that 110 of these 148 PCRs reflected low numbers of E. coli in the enrichment broth and could be explained as due to Poisson limiting dilution of the template, affecting both cassette PCR and conventional PCR. Of the remaining 38 discordant tests, 27 initial capillary PCRs and 10 initial conventional tests were nominally discordant between cassette and conventional PCR, perhaps reflecting human/technical error on both sides of the comparison. CONCLUSIONS: Contaminated beef carcass swabs were often complex, likely harboring more than one strain of pathogenic E. coli. Cassette PCR had 98.8% concordance with parallel conventional PCR for detection of STEC genes. This indicates that cassette PCR is highly reliable for detecting multiple pathogens in beef carcass swabs from processing plants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".