MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2966176567 · doi:10.22329/jtl.v12i2.5965

Making Men, Making Masculinities: Canadian Masculinities across Time and Place

2019· article· en· W2966176567 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Teaching and Learning · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchitecture and Cultural Influences
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPsychologyComputer sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Making Men, Making History: Canadian Masculinities across Time and Place situates the study of masculinities within the Canadian cultural context.Through a carefully-selected collection of essays, Gossage and Rutherdale open a vista onto the Canadian landscape.This vista is made all the richer by its range, as the collection draws on a divergence of both time and place in order to address gendered constructs.Beyond these temporal and geographical glimpses, the anthology is divided into six sections: expertise and authority, masculine spaces, performing masculinities, boys to men, men in motion, and faces of fatherhood.What may on first glance seem an arbitrary structuring, the collection takes on the tones of a symphonic arrangement, enticing the reader to listen for those notes that strike a relevant chord within one's own understanding of gender within Canada.Ultimately, of course, it invites researchers to sound those chords that are the most intriguing and relevant to their own research.The anthology offers an orchestration of complex and far-ranging variations on the theme of manhood, and it is in this variety and richness that one finds a book which lends a compelling contribution to the field of masculinities.The high-interest content of this volume renders it just as relevant and accessible to the casual reader as to the historian or scholar.This anthology can easily be imagined as a core text in a course offered within gender studies, Canadian history, or more specifically, the history of masculinities.Masculinities is in itself a relatively recent category of historical research and the attempt to plant its seeds on Canadian soil has, through this anthology, been both fruitful, and one would imagine, quite sustainable.From the middle-class men of the Edmonton packinghouses (1947)(1948)(1949)(1950)(1951)(1952)(1953)(1954)(1955)(1956)(1957)(1958)(1959)(1960)(1961)(1962)(1963)(1964)(1965)(1966), to the dynamics of the gay bars of Montreal, the book leads the reader through a Book Review: Making Men, Making History

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.658

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0360.025
Scholarly communication0.0100.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Teaching and LearningSame topicArchitecture and Cultural InfluencesFrench-language works237,207