Making Men, Making Masculinities: Canadian Masculinities across Time and Place
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Making Men, Making History: Canadian Masculinities across Time and Place situates the study of masculinities within the Canadian cultural context. Through a carefully-selected collection of essays, Gossage and Rutherdale open a vista onto the Canadian landscape. This vista is made all the richer by its range, as the collection draws on a divergence of both time and place in order to address gendered constructs. Beyond these temporal and geographical glimpses, the anthology is divided into six sections: expertise and authority, masculine spaces, performing masculinities, boys to men, men in motion, and faces of fatherhood. What may on first glance seem an arbitrary structuring, the collection takes on the tones of a symphonic arrangement, enticing the reader to listen for those notes that strike a relevant chord within one's own understanding of gender within Canada. Ultimately, of course, it invites researchers to sound those chords that are the most intriguing and relevant to their own research. The anthology offers an orchestration of complex and far-ranging variations on the theme of manhood, and it is in this variety and richness that one finds a book which lends a compelling contribution to the field of masculinities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".