MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2966237043 · doi:10.11575/prism/36651

Validation of the Mild Behavioral Impairment-Checklist in Subjective Cognitive Decline, Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia

2019· dissertation· en· W2966237043 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sophie Hu

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2019
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDementiaCognitive impairmentChecklistPsychologyCognitionClinical psychologyCognitive declineGerontologyPsychiatryMedicineCognitive psychologyDiseasePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are early markers of dementia preceding cognitive impairment. The Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist (MBI-C) was developed to characterize NPS for pre-dementia patients. This thesis examines the validity and utility of the MBI-C for detecting neuropsychiatric symptoms in relation to cognition. Objectives: This study was conducted in three parts: 1) To compare factors of the MBI-C and Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Questionnaire (NPI-Q) using factor analysis. 2) To determine the association between baseline MBI-C and NPI-Q severity scores with cognition. 3) To determine the predictive utility of MBI-C and NPI-Q severity scores for change in cognition. Methods: Patients diagnosed with subjective cognitive decline, mild cognitive impairment and dementia were sampled from a cognitive neurology clinic. 1) Exploratory factor analysis was conducted to determine MBI-C and NPI-Q domains. 2) The association between baseline MBI-C and NPI-Q severity and cognition, as measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), was modelled using linear regression analysis. 3) The association between MBI-C and NPI-Q severity at baseline and change in cognition per six months was modelled using generalized linear mixed models. Results: 1) The MBI-C is a valid five-factor questionnaire with the following domains: apathy, mood/anxiety, impulse dyscontrol, social inappropriateness, and psychosis. Anhedonia and appetite disturbances are features that load onto apathy. The NPI-Q is a one-factor questionnaire in our sample. (2) Higher MBI-C and NPI-Q severity is associated with decreased cognition. MBI prevalence increases with increasing severity of cognitive diagnosis. All MBI-C domains are significantly associated with lower MoCA. Psychosis is most strongly associated and total score is most weakly associated. The MBI-C identifies age, sex and diagnosis-specific estimates. 3) Baseline MBI-C and NPI-Q scores predict cognitive decline over time. Impulse dyscontrol, mood/anxiety and social inappropriateness are most predictive of cognitive decline. Conclusions: Neuropsychiatric symptoms are associated with cognitive decline in pre-dementia and dementia patients. The MBI-C is a valid five-factor questionnaire for detecting NPS and is especially robust in pre-dementia patients. MBI domains are indicative and predictive of cognitive decline and can be targeted for management of NPS. The NPI-Q is not as applicable to pre-dementia and does not fully capture NPS groupings. The MBI-C and NPI-Q act as complements and both should be administered with consideration of patient status.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207