MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Reference Frames Which Separately Store Noncommuting Conserved Quantities

2020· article· en· W2966306500 on OpenAlexafffund
Sandu Popescu, Ana Belén Sainz, Anthony Short, Andreas Winter

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
Canadian institutionsPerimeter Institute
FundersEuropean Regional Development FundOntario Ministry of Research, Innovation and ScienceMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadGovernment of CanadaGeneralitat de CatalunyaFundacja na rzecz Nauki PolskiejEidgenössische Technische Hochschule ZürichInstitut Périmètre de physique théoriqueInnovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
KeywordsConserved quantityReference frameConservation lawFrame (networking)Frame of referencePhysicsAngular momentumSpin (aerodynamics)QuantumKey (lock)Conserved sequenceClassical mechanicsComputer scienceMathematical physicsQuantum mechanicsGeneBiologyGeneticsThermodynamicsBase sequence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Even in the presence of conservation laws, one can perform arbitrary transformations on a system if given access to a suitable reference frame, since conserved quantities may be exchanged between the system and the frame. Here we explore whether these quantities can be separated into different parts of the reference frame, with each part acting as a "battery" for a distinct quantity. For systems composed of spin-1/2 particles, we show that the components of angular momentum S_{x}, S_{y}, and S_{z} (noncommuting conserved quantities) may be separated in this way, and also provide several extensions of this result. These results also play a key role in the quantum thermodynamics of noncommuting conserved quantities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.817
Threshold uncertainty score0.715

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical MechanicsFrench-language works237,207