MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2966489167 · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.119.026211

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Unruptured Versus Ruptured Pediatric Brain Arteriovenous Malformations

2019· article· en· W2966489167 on OpenAlexaff
Ching‐Jen Chen, Cheng‐Chia Lee, Dale Ding, Shih-Wei Tzeng, Kathryn N. Kearns, Hideyuki Kano, Ahmet Atik, Natasha Ironside, Krishna C. Joshi, Paul P. Huang, Douglas Kondziolka, David Mathieu, Christian Iorio‐Morin, Inga S. Grills, Thomas J. Quinn, Z.A. Siddiqui, Kim Marvin, Caleb Feliciano, Andrew Faramand, Robert M. Starke, Gene H. Barnett, L. Dade Lunsford, Jason P. Sheehan

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRadiosurgeryArteriovenous malformationRetrospective cohort studyNuclear medicineIntracranial Arteriovenous MalformationsCohortConfidence intervalOdds ratioRadiologySurgeryRadiation therapyCerebral angiographyAngiographyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Purpose— The effects of prior hemorrhage on stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) outcomes for pediatric arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are not well defined. The aim of this multicenter, retrospective cohort study is to compare the SRS outcomes for unruptured versus ruptured pediatric AVMs. Methods— The International Radiosurgery Research Foundation pediatric AVM database from 1987 to 2018 was reviewed retrospectively. Favorable outcome was defined as AVM obliteration, no post-SRS hemorrhage, and no permanently symptomatic radiation-induced changes. Associations between prior hemorrhage and outcomes were adjusted for baseline differences, inverse probability weights, and competing risks. Results— The study cohort comprised 153 unruptured and 386 ruptured AVMs. Favorable outcome was achieved in 48.4% and 60.4% of unruptured and ruptured AVMs, respectively (adjusted odds ratio, 1.353; P =0.190). Cumulative AVM obliteration probabilities were 51.2%, 59.4%, 64.2%, and 70.0% for unruptured and 61.0%, 69.3%, 74.0%, and 79.3% for ruptured AVMs at 4, 6, 8, and 10 years, respectively (subhazard ratio, 1.311; P =0.020). Cumulative post-SRS hemorrhage probabilities were 4.5%, 5.6%, 5.6%, and 9.8% for unruptured and 4.7%, 6.1%, 6.1%, and 10.6% for ruptured AVMs at 4, 6, 8, and 10 years, respectively (subhazard ratio, 1.086; P =0.825). Probabilities of AVM obliteration (adjusted subhazard ratio, 0.968; P =0.850) and post-SRS hemorrhage (adjusted subhazard ratio, 1.663; P =0.251) were comparable between the 2 cohorts after inverse probability weight adjustments. Symptomatic (15.8% versus 8.1%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.400; P =0.008) and permanent (9.2% versus 5.0%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.441; P =0.045) radiation-induced change were more common in unruptured AVMs. Conclusions— The overall outcomes after SRS for unruptured versus ruptured pediatric AVMs are comparable. However, symptomatic and permanent radiation-induced change occur more frequently in pediatric patients with unruptured AVMs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStrokeSame topicVascular Malformations Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207