New minerals and nomenclature modifications approved in 2012 and 2013
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The information given here is provided by the IMA Commission on New Minerals, Nomenclature and Classification for comparative purposes and as a service to mineralogists working on new species. Each mineral is described in the following format: Mineral name, if the authors agree on its release prior to the full description appearing in press Chemical formula Type locality Full authorship of proposal E-mail address of corresponding author Relationship to other minerals Crystal system, Space group; Structure determined, yes or no Unit-cell parameters Strongest lines in the X-ray powder diffraction pattern Type specimen repository and specimen number Citation details for the mineral prior to publication of full description Citation details concern the fact that this information will be published in the Mineralogical Magazine on a routine basis, as well as being added month by month to the Commission's web site. It is still a requirement for the authors to publish a full description of the new mineral. NO OTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE COMMISSION IMA No. 2012-039 Ca1–2Fe[(Si,Al,Be)5Be2O13(OH)2]·2H2O In a syenite pegmatite at Langangen, Blafjell, Norway (59°5′34″N 9°41′38″E) and the A/S Granite Quarry, Tvedalen, Vestfold, Norway J. Grice*, R. Kristiansen, H. Friis, R. Rowe, R.S. Selbekk, M. Cooper, A.O. Larsen and G. Poirier *E-mail: jgrice@mus-nature.ca Interrupted framework zeolite Monoclinic: P 21/ c ; structure determined a = 8.759(5), b = 4.864(2), c = 31.258(7) A, β = 90.31(3)° 15.555(100), 4.104(29), 3.938(36), 3.909(60), 3.820(30), 3.251(66), 3.186(27), 2.884(64) Type material is deposited in the collections of the Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa, Canada, specimen number CNMMC 86554, and the Natural History Museum, Oslo, Norway, specimen numbers 43434 and 43435 How to cite: Grice, J., Kristiansen, R., Friis, H., Rowe, R., Selbekk, R.S., Cooper, M., Larsen, A.O. and …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.012 | 0.013 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.110 | 0.100 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".