MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2966683173 · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2953276

Online Multi-Object Tracking With GMPHD Filter and Occlusion Group Management

2019· article· en· W2966683173 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersInstitute for Information and Communications Technology PromotionMinistry of Science and ICT, South KoreaIran Telecommunication Research CenterNational Research Foundation of KoreaMinistry of Science, ICT and Future PlanningNational Research Foundation
KeywordsComputer scienceTracking (education)Video trackingComputer visionObject (grammar)Group (periodic table)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose an efficient online multi-object tracking method based on the Gaussian mixture probability hypothesis density (GMPHD) filter and occlusion group management scheme where a hierarchical data association is utilized for the GMPHD filter to reduce the false negatives caused by missed detection. The hierarchical data association consisting of two modules, detection-to-track and track-to-track associations, can recover the lost tracks and their switched IDs. In addition, the proposed grouping management scheme handles occlusion problems with two main parts. The first part, “track merging” can merge the false positive tracks caused by false positive detections from occlusions. The occlusion of the false positive tracks is usually measured with some metric. In this research, we define the occlusion measure between visual objects, as sum-of-intersection-over-each-area (SIOA) instead of the commonly used intersection-over-union (IOU). The second part, “occlusion group energy minimization (OGEM)” prevents the occluded true positive tracks from false “track merging”. Each group of the occluded objects is expressed with an energy function and an optimal hypothesis will be obtained by minimizing the energy. We evaluate the proposed tracker in benchmarks such as MOT15 and MOT17 which are public datasets for multi-person tracking. An ablation study in training dataset reveals not only that “track merging” and “OGEM” complement each other, but also that the proposed tracking method shows more robust performance and less sensitiveness than baseline methods. Also, the tracking performance with SIOA is better than that with IOU for various sizes of false positives. Experimental results show that the proposed tracker efficiently handles occlusion situations and achieves competitive performance compared to the state-of-the-art methods. In fact, our method shows the best multi-object tracking accuracy among the online and real-time executable methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.711
Threshold uncertainty score0.497

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it