MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2966683173 · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2953276

Online Multi-Object Tracking With GMPHD Filter and Occlusion Group Management

2019· article· en· W2966683173 on OpenAlexaff
Young-Min Song, Kwangjin Yoon, Young-Chul Yoon, Kin‐Choong Yow, Moongu Jeon

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersInstitute for Information and Communications Technology PromotionMinistry of Science and ICT, South KoreaIran Telecommunication Research CenterNational Research Foundation of KoreaMinistry of Science, ICT and Future PlanningNational Research Foundation
KeywordsComputer scienceTracking (education)Video trackingComputer visionObject (grammar)Group (periodic table)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose an efficient online multi-object tracking method based on the Gaussian mixture probability hypothesis density (GMPHD) filter and occlusion group management scheme where a hierarchical data association is utilized for the GMPHD filter to reduce the false negatives caused by missed detection. The hierarchical data association consisting of two modules, detection-to-track and track-to-track associations, can recover the lost tracks and their switched IDs. In addition, the proposed grouping management scheme handles occlusion problems with two main parts. The first part, “track merging” can merge the false positive tracks caused by false positive detections from occlusions. The occlusion of the false positive tracks is usually measured with some metric. In this research, we define the occlusion measure between visual objects, as sum-of-intersection-over-each-area (SIOA) instead of the commonly used intersection-over-union (IOU). The second part, “occlusion group energy minimization (OGEM)” prevents the occluded true positive tracks from false “track merging”. Each group of the occluded objects is expressed with an energy function and an optimal hypothesis will be obtained by minimizing the energy. We evaluate the proposed tracker in benchmarks such as MOT15 and MOT17 which are public datasets for multi-person tracking. An ablation study in training dataset reveals not only that “track merging” and “OGEM” complement each other, but also that the proposed tracking method shows more robust performance and less sensitiveness than baseline methods. Also, the tracking performance with SIOA is better than that with IOU for various sizes of false positives. Experimental results show that the proposed tracker efficiently handles occlusion situations and achieves competitive performance compared to the state-of-the-art methods. In fact, our method shows the best multi-object tracking accuracy among the online and real-time executable methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsFrench-language works237,207