Defining Protein Pattern Differences Among Molecular Subtypes of Diffuse Gliomas Using Mass Spectrometry*[S]
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Molecular characterization of diffuse gliomas has thus far largely focused on genomic and transcriptomic interrogations. Here, we utilized mass spectrometry and overlay protein-level information onto genomically defined cohorts of diffuse gliomas to improve our downstream molecular understanding of these lethal malignancies. Bulk and macrodissected tissues were utilized to quantitate 5,496 unique proteins over three glioma cohorts subclassified largely based on their IDH and 1p19q codeletion status (IDH wild type (IDHwt), n = 7; IDH mutated (IDHmt), 1p19q non-codeleted, n = 7; IDH mutated, 1p19q-codeleted, n = 10). Clustering analysis highlighted proteome and systems-level pathway differences in gliomas according to IDH and 1p19q-codeletion status, including 287 differentially abundant proteins in macrodissection-enriched tumor specimens. IDHwt tumors were enriched for proteins involved in invasiveness and epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT), while IDHmt gliomas had increased abundances of proteins involved in mRNA splicing. Finally, these abundance changes were compared with IDH-matched GBM stem-like cells (GSCs) to better pinpoint protein patterns enriched in putative cellular drivers of gliomas. Using this integrative approach, we outline specific proteins involved in chloride transport ( e.g. chloride intracellular channel 1, CLIC1) and EMT ( e.g. procollagen-lysine, 2-oxoglutarate 5-dioxygenase 3, PLOD3, and serpin peptidase inhibitor clade H member 1, SERPINH1) that showed concordant IDH-status-dependent abundance differences in both primary tissue and purified GSC cultures. Given the downstream position proteins occupy in driving biology and phenotype, understanding the proteomic patterns operational in distinct glioma subtypes could help propose more specific, personalized, and effective targets for the management of patients with these aggressive malignancies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".