MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2966798708 · doi:10.1088/2050-6120/ab2b2f

Concentric FRET: a review of the emerging concept, theory, and applications

2019· review· en· W2966798708 on OpenAlexafffund
Hsin-Yun Tsai, Hyungki Kim, Melissa Massey, Katherine D. Krause, W. Russ Algar

Bibliographic record

VenueMethods and Applications in Fluorescence · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersBritish Columbia Knowledge Development FundNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsMichael Smith Health Research BCCanada Foundation for InnovationAlfred P. Sloan Foundation
KeywordsFörster resonance energy transferBioanalysisNanotechnologyPhotobleachingContext (archaeology)Quantum dotQuenching (fluorescence)Computer scienceChemistryFluorescenceMaterials sciencePhysicsBiologyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Concentric Förster resonance energy transfer (cFRET) is an emerging concept for single-vector multiplexed bioanalysis and imaging. It features a network of competitive and sequential energy transfer pathways, which, to date, has been assembled with a central semiconductor quantum dot (QD) and biomolecular linkers to multiple copies of multiple types of concentrically-arranged fluorescent dyes. In this review, we provide a first-hand account of the concept and development of cFRET, starting from its place in the broader context of FRET probes and assemblies. Topics of discussion include materials for cFRET, with a focus on the enabling properties of QDs and the ideal properties of nominal acceptor dyes; characterization and analysis of cFRET configurations via photoluminescence intensity, emission ratio, lifetime, and photobleaching measurements; semi-empirical modeling to determine the rates and efficiencies of competitive and sequential FRET pathways from overall quenching efficiencies; and archetypical examples of cFRET configurations and their application in bioanalysis and imaging. Most of the latter examples demonstrate multiplexed detection of protease activity or nucleic acid targets. Examples of atypical and cFRET-like configurations are also discussed, including those that utilize time-gated FRET relays and charge-transfer quenching. We conclude with a perspective on challenges and directions for future research with cFRET. Although still emerging as a method, many exciting opportunities in bioanalysis, imaging, and beyond are envisioned for cFRET.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.619

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.393 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMethods and Applications in FluorescenceSame topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniquesFrench-language works237,207