MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2966815890 · doi:10.3168/jds.2019-16687

Technical note: Assessment of neutrophil endocytosis and proteolytic degradation and its relationship with phagocytosis and oxidative burst in dairy cows

2019· article· en· W2966815890 on OpenAlexaff
Osvaldo Bogado Pascottini, Monica Baquero, Rita Couto Serrenho, S. J. Van Schyndel, Dorothee Bienzle, S.J. LeBlanc

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dairy Science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicNeutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRespiratory burstPhagocytosisOvalbuminChemistryMolecular biologyImmunologyOxidative phosphorylationAndrologyBiochemistryBiologyImmune systemMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Conventional assays of polymorphonuclear cell (PMN, neutrophil) function such as oxidative burst (OB) and phagocytosis (PC) are widely used to evaluate innate immunity in the transition period of dairy cows. Oxidative burst is commonly evaluated by measuring PMN median fluorescence intensity (MFI) involving the release of reactive oxygen species after in vitro stimulation. Phagocytosis can be measured by engulfment of fluorescent beads by PMN. DQ-ovalbumin (DQ-OVA) is a molecule suitable for the assessment of intracellular proteolytic degradation, so it might be informative about an additional pathway of pathogen handling by PMN. In this study, we evaluated the use of the DQ-OVA assay for the assessment of PMN function and the relationships among OB, PC, and DQ-OVA results in PMN isolated from blood of dairy cows between 5 and 21 d post partum. Results of the DQ-OVA validation assay were assessed with mixed linear regression models. Pearson correlation tests and kappa values for agreement were used to associate the MFI between each PMN function assay (OB, PC, and DQ-OVA). For the validation assay (9 cows in 3 replicates), PMN incubated with DQ-OVA were stimulated with IFN-γ or inhibited with cytochalasin D, and fluorescence was compared with untreated PMN. Stimulated and inhibited PMN had greater (970 ± 160 units) and lesser (593 ± 55 units) MFI relative to untreated PMN (791 ± 154 units), respectively, indicating that DQ-OVA fluorescence reflected enhanced or reduced endocytic and proteolytic function. To associate the MFI outcomes among OB, PC, and DQ-OVA, 153 samples from 40 cows were analyzed. Results showed significant, although weak association between DQ-OVA and PC MFI (Pearson r = 0.16). When values of MFI were categorized according to the first ("high" PMN functionality), second and third ("moderate" PMN functionality), or fourth ("low" PMN functionality) quartiles, agreement beyond chance (κ) was moderate: κ = 0.38 for DQ-OVA and OB, κ = 0.43 for DQ-OVA and PC, and κ = 0.43 for OB and PC. The DQ-OVA assay may complement traditional PMN functional assays because it provides additional information regarding the combination of endocytosis and proteolytic degradation, but it is not a substitute for assessment of OB or PC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dairy ScienceSame topicNeutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative MechanismsFrench-language works237,207