Specificity of Acyl Chain Composition of Phosphatidylinositols
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phosphatidylinositol (PI) lipids have a predominance of a single molecular species present through the organism. In healthy mammals this molecular species is 1-stearoyl-2-arachidonoyl (18:0/20:4) PI. Although the importance of PI lipids for cell physiology has long been appreciated, less is known about the biological role of enriching PI lipids with 18:0/20:4 acyl chains. In conditions with dysfunctional lipid metabolism, the predominance of 18:0/20:4 acyl chains is lost. Recently, molecular mechanisms underpinning the enrichment or alteration of these acyl chains in PI lipids have begun to emerge. In the majority of the cases a common feature is the presence of enzymes bearing substrate acyl chain specificity. However, in cancer cells, it has been shown that one (not the only) of the mechanisms responsible for the loss in this acyl chain enrichment is mutation on the transcription factor p53 gene, which is one of the most highly mutated genes in cancers. There is a compelling need for a global picture of the specificity of the acyl chain composition of PIs. This can be possible once high-resolution spatio-temporal information is gathered in a cellular context; which can ultimately lead to potential novel targets to combat conditions with altered PI acyl chain profiles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".