MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2966868452 · doi:10.4148/2378-5977.7782

Inoculation Timing Effect on Biological Nitrogen Fixation and Soybean Productivity

2019· article· en· W2966868452 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mario A. Secchi, Adalgisa Ribeiro Torres, Luiz H. Moro Rosso, Ignacio A. Ciampitti

Bibliographic record

VenueKansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLegume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNitrogen fixationRandomized block designBiologyGrowing seasonInoculationProductivityAgronomyLegumeBiomass (ecology)SymbiosisNutrientDiazotrophField experimentHorticultureBacteriaEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], as other legume species, has the characteristic of fixing nitrogen (N) from the atmosphere via the biological N fixation (BNF) process. When a proper symbiosis relationship between soybeans and specific bacteria has been established, the plants can obtain up to 98% of the total N need. However, several factors can negatively affect BNF, impairing its contribution to nutrient demand and reducing crop productivity. In this scenario, additional inoculation could help the plant to overcome potential N gaps in BNF. Therefore, the goal of this project was to investigate if additional inoculation at different growth stages of the soybean growing season could increase nodulation, improve BNF (N contribution) and productivity of two varieties from maturity groups (MG) III and IV. To address this objective, different strategies for N supply were tested in a greenhouse and two field locations (Ashland Bottoms and Ottawa, KS) during the 2018 growing season. Trials were arranged in a complete randomized block design with four replications. The main outcomes of this study were that nodulation (total number of nodules per plant), plant dry biomass, rela­tive abundance of ureide (RAU (%), indirect measurement of BNF), and productivity did not differ between inoculated treatments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.366
Threshold uncertainty score0.328

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research ReportsSame topicLegume Nitrogen Fixing SymbiosisFrench-language works237,207