<i>Diaporthe eres</i> causes stem cankers and death of young apple rootstocks in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the spring of 2018, necrotic and canker symptoms were observed on stems of young apple trees that were bench-grafted by growers on four rootstocks (EMLA 9, Supporter 4, M9-T337 and Pajam 2) in Annapolis Valley, Nova Scotia. The objective of this study was to isolate and identify the causal organism of the disease on apple rootstocks. The diseased tissue obtained from eight infected plants of the four rootstocks showing visible necrotic and canker symptoms was used for microorganism isolation on potato dextrose agar (PDA). More than 90% of the isolates on PDA yielded a similar type of fungal colony. Based on the colony and spore morphology and presence of both α and β spores, Diaporthe was proposed as a major pathogen from the symptomatic tissue. Analysis of partial sequences of four unlinked loci DNA-lyase (APN2), histone-3 (HIS), translation elongation factor 1 alpha (TEF1-α) and the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) 5.8S region of rDNA of the representative fungal isolates from young apple trees confirmed its identity as D. eres (Phomopsis fukushii). The pathogenicity of the representative D. eres isolate was confirmed on 1-year-old young apple trees bench-grafted on four different rootstocks in greenhouse tests. Necrotic and sunken canker symptoms like those observed on the nursery-grown young apple trees appeared on stems of all inoculated plants. The necrotic and canker lesions were observed 3 days after inoculation; they spread both directions from the inoculation point and led to the death of the young plants after 4 weeks. To our knowledge, this is the first report of D. eres causing stem canker and death of young apple rootstock in Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".