Phosphinoboration of Diazobenzene: Intramolecular FLP Synthon for PN<sub>2</sub>B‐Derived Heterocycles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Phosphinoboration of diazobenzene with Ph2PBR′2 cleanly affords products of the form Ph2P(PhNNPh)BR′2 (2: R′2=catechol, cat; 4: R′2=phenanthrenediol, quin) and shows evidence of Ph2P(PhNNPh)Bpin 7 (pin: pinacol). The mechanism of these reactions was probed computationally and shown to proceed via intermediates involving a diazobenzene‐adduct of the boron center of the PB reagent. The resulting PNNB species 2 and 4 are shown to be frustrated Lewis pairs (FLPs). Despite the presence of weakly Lewis acidic boron centers, these species react with diazobenzene. Additionally, the FLP reactivity of 2 was further probed with 4‐phenyl‐1,2,4‐triazole‐3,5‐dione, 1,10‐phenanthroline‐5,6‐dione, and benzyl azide to give unique five‐, six‐, and eight‐membered heterocyclic rings. Thus, phosphinoboration provides a new avenue to FLPs in which donor and acceptor sites are linked by nitrogen atoms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".